<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interflora to sue over Google AdWords tactics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukfastblog.co.uk/2008/12/10/interflora-to-sue-over-google-adwords-tactics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukfastblog.co.uk/2008/12/10/interflora-to-sue-over-google-adwords-tactics/</link>
	<description>News and views from the UK&#039;s best hosting provider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.ukfastblog.co.uk/2008/12/10/interflora-to-sue-over-google-adwords-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukfastblog.live.text.co.uk/?p=2683#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Google developed the confidence to go ahead with its AdWords change after Yahoo won a similar court case back in March. The High Court ruled that it was acceptable for Yahoo to display ads for Sainsbury&#039;s supermarket when another company’s trademark was entered as a search term. Crucially, the court determined that plain English words were being sponsored by Sainsbury’s not a specific trademark. However, it was inevitable that Google would be challenged. It is just likely that it will win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google developed the confidence to go ahead with its AdWords change after Yahoo won a similar court case back in March. The High Court ruled that it was acceptable for Yahoo to display ads for Sainsbury&#8217;s supermarket when another company’s trademark was entered as a search term. Crucially, the court determined that plain English words were being sponsored by Sainsbury’s not a specific trademark. However, it was inevitable that Google would be challenged. It is just likely that it will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.ukfastblog.co.uk/2008/12/10/interflora-to-sue-over-google-adwords-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukfastblog.live.text.co.uk/?p=2683#comment-323</guid>
		<description>It makes life much more interesting when businesses can bid on each others brands. I suppose it promotes competition and keeps market leaders on their toes. Fun and games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes life much more interesting when businesses can bid on each others brands. I suppose it promotes competition and keeps market leaders on their toes. Fun and games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
